Friday, March 2, 2007

"Amazing Grace": Its Intrinsic Slavery Spin

Given the release of "Amazing Grace" this weekend, I thought it germane to point out the factual inaccuracies in the spin behind the movie: namely, that it was the force of Christianity that brought slavery to an end, or that the majority of Christians opposed slavery. That simply isn't true: the Bible was used to defend slavery for years, especially passages like Lev 25:44-46 and Ex 21:2-21.

John Newton was a pastor and author of "Amazing Grace" and "Glorious Things of Thee Are Spoken."...

INTERVIEWER: What mythology did you yourself hold that you discovered was wrong when you did your research?

TURNER: I think I just knew the basic skeleton of this story. I knew Newton was a slave trader, I knew that he had been in a storm, and I knew he'd written a song. I didn't really know the sequence in which that happened. Arlo Guthrie tells the story on stage that Newton was transporting slaves and the storm hit the boat, he was converted on the spot, changed his mind about slavery, took the slaves back to Africa, released them, came back to England, and wrote the song. That would be nice. That would be the way we'd like to write the story. But the fact is that he took years and years before he came to the abolition position. And he never captained a slave ship until after he became a Christian. All his life as a slave captain was actually post-conversion.
Ed has much more, and he details how many abolitionists were branded atheists and infidels for opposing slavery based on humanistic values, in opposition to, or at least without referring to, the basis of the Bible.
It is said that William Wilberforce, the famed British abolitionist, was a Christian. But at any rate his Christianity was strongly diluted with unbelief [in the literal words of the Old Testament]. As an abolitionist he did not believe Leviticus 25: 44-6; he must have rejected Exodus 21: 2-6; he could not have accepted the many permissions and injunctions by the Bible deity to his chosen people to capture and hold slaves. In the House of Commons on 18th February, 1796, Wilberforce reminded that Christian assembly that infidel and anarchic France had already given liberty to its African slaves, whilst Christian and monarchic England was “obstinately continuing a system of cruelty and injustice.”
Sounds a lot like today's social culture wars, in the sense that the most liberal and least religious countries have already enacted laws respecting equality in marriage and adoption, while Christianized countries like our own stubbornly hold on to discrimination, and attempt to inject it into state and federal constitutions at every opportunity.
When William Lloyd Garrison, the pure-minded and most earnest abolitionist, delivered his first anti-slavery address in Boston, Massachusetts, the only building he could obtain, in which to speak, was the infidel hall owned by Abner Kneeland, the “infidel” editor of the Boston Investigator, who had been sent to jail for blasphemy. Every Christian sect had in turn refused Mr. Lloyd Garrison the use of the buildings they controlled. Lloyd Garrison told me himself how honored deacons of a Christian Church joined in an actual attempt to hang him...

When abolition was advocated in the United States in 1790 the representative from South Carolina was able to plead that the Southern clergy did not condemn either slavery or the slave trade, and Mr. Jackson, the representative from Georgia, pleaded that “from Genesis to Revelation” the Bible remained favorable to slavery.

Elias Hicks, the brave Abolitionist Quaker, was denounced as an atheist. And, less than twenty years ago a Hicksite Quaker was expelled from one of the Southern American Legislatures, because of the reputed irreligion of abolitionist Quakers.

When the “Fugitive Slave Law” was under discussion in North America [a law that demanded all runaway slaves be returned to their masters who then got to punish them grievously for escaping], large numbers of Northern clergymen of nearly every denomination were found ready to defend this infamous law.

Samuel James May, the famous Northern abolitionist, was driven from the pulpit as irreligious, solely because of his attacks on slave-holding. Northern clergymen tried to induce “silver tongued” Wendell Phillips to abandon his advocacy of abolition. Southern pulpits rang with praises for the murderous attack on Charles Sumner. The slayers of Elijah Lovejoy were highly reputed Christian men.
Bunch of damned liberals, always resorting to "human rights" and "human dignity" rather than what the Bible says...I wonder if the dominionists (like Kennedy) want to re-institute slavery and stoning, while they're busy regressing America back to the OT?

Next time you hear someone mention how uplifting to the soul this movie is, or about the song "Amazing Grace" remind them that Newton only began captaining slave ships after his Christian conversion, and that he spent about six years doing it afterwards, before being influenced by humanistic arguments, like those advanced by Franklin and Paine in America, to become an abolitionist.
________________
Technorati tags: , ,